CNN almost completely ignored last year's landmark Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, but this week CNN.com extensively covered a discredited climate science denier theory that was mentioned in a non-peer-reviewed study.
If "objective" news outlets were proactively trying to get people to not care about the climate crisis, how would it look different than what we have now?
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Thursday, July 9, 2015
The Only One Direction Video I Will Ever Post
One Direction is asking its fans to help solve problems like poverty and climate change:
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
GOP: I'm Not a Scientist, and I Don't Listen to Them Either
@Uptomyknees POPE: Global warming is real!
conservatives: leave science to scientists!
EVERY SCIENTIST: um?
conservatives: fuck off nerds
— Todd Slade (@todd_slade) July 8, 2015
But More People Don't Bike Because #AmericasLoveAffairWithCars!
Mailbox post in trash can filled with cement in middle of sidewalk in Mattapoisett, MA |
Obstacles encountered on the sidewalk of Route 6 in Mattapoisett recently while trying to bike home:
- Utility poles
- Trash carts left by pickup crews in the middle of the sidewalk
- Abandoned traffic cones
- Abandoned utility pole support posts now supporting nothing
- Mailbox posts
- Shards of old mailbox posts sticking up out of the sidewalk
- Mailbox posts built into trash cans filled with cement in the middle of the sidewalk, because mailbox safety clearly trumps people on bicycle safety
- Untrimmed tree branches hanging down
- Untrimmed bushes pushing out from the side
- Deep driveway curb cuts, because the last thing we'd want to do is make cars slow down while driving across the sidewalk
Considering Route 6 is lightly traveled and I-195 parallels it just one mile to the north, it would be easy to add a bike lane, or at least an adequately wide sidewalk.
But that would mean slightly reducing vehicle speeds! How much of our freedom are we really willing to give up for complete streets? As a neighbor asked in nearby Wareham, won't someone think of the children?
"You want them to make room for all these bikers? It'll be a narrower road for ambulances heading to Tobey Hospital and school kids traveling home. There is limited space down there."Clearly bike paths are death traps that eat the young & sick. The only way to make things safe is to give cars even more room to drive even faster!
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Parking Lot Historic, Solar Farm Not
NextSun Energy wants to build a small solar farm not far from me in Rochester, MA. While I don't know if this is the right place for the project, some of the opposition is ... not exactly honest. From the Sippican Week:
Except it's right across the street from a shopping plaza with a huge parking lot:
The New Bedford Standard-Times doesn't mention the disconnect either.
And what kind of bucolic-character-destroying development are we talking about? Here's another NextSun project:
Looks exactly like lower Manhattan to me!
People can oppose whatever they want & that's certainly their right. But let's be honest: Historic preservation is often used as a shield for personal preference. At a time when we need to be building clean energy as quickly as possible to slow the climate crisis, is that enough justification to use government authority to block projects like this?
“I know there are four abutters or more. It’s an island of commercial in a residential area,” Monteiro said.Such a historic area, clearly undisturbed since colonial times!
The historic district is an area that encompasses three square miles in the center of town. Buildings such as Plumb Library, the First Congregational Church and Town Hall are all located in the area.
Except it's right across the street from a shopping plaza with a huge parking lot:
The New Bedford Standard-Times doesn't mention the disconnect either.
And what kind of bucolic-character-destroying development are we talking about? Here's another NextSun project:
Looks exactly like lower Manhattan to me!
People can oppose whatever they want & that's certainly their right. But let's be honest: Historic preservation is often used as a shield for personal preference. At a time when we need to be building clean energy as quickly as possible to slow the climate crisis, is that enough justification to use government authority to block projects like this?