tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29774939.post2267094492090758569..comments2023-07-20T10:16:46.141-04:00Comments on TheGreenMiles.com: Riding Rails, Saving Cash, Easing HeadachesTheGreenMileshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15774630689123316690noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29774939.post-75633220196856900692008-09-28T12:37:00.000-04:002008-09-28T12:37:00.000-04:00I did look into the bus, but the BoltBus especiall...I did look into the bus, but the BoltBus especially seems like a good deal, but Amtrak just worked better with where I wanted to go. And as the graphic shows, trains do have a smaller carbon footprint than buses on a per-passenger basis.<BR/><BR/>You're right about the WiFi though, more on that <A HREF="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/05/amtraks_choice_1.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>. If they can do it in the UK, why can't they do it on Amtrak?TheGreenMileshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15774630689123316690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29774939.post-61607657675416946302008-09-27T17:30:00.000-04:002008-09-27T17:30:00.000-04:00You know you can catch the express buses and get a...You know you can catch the express buses and get all the way to Boston for about $40 (you need to switch in NY). It does add some time, but saves a pretty fat wad of cash.<BR/><BR/>At least one of the buses has free wi-fi, too.<BR/><BR/>The buses have an even smaller carbon footprint than the train, to boot.<BR/><BR/>Go Red Sox!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com