But I had to take a minute to pass along this article (via TPM):
Michelle Obama planted an organic garden to promote fruits and vegetables as part of a healthy diet, but some chemical companies are worried it may plant a seed of doubt in consumers’ minds about conventionally grown crops. [...]Talk about setting up a straw-man argument. Who says a garden is supposed to be your family's only source of food? Don't have time to garden? Who says you have to -- shop at a farmers market or buy organic at the grocery store.
MACA, which represents agribusinesses like Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection, is rather less thrilled about the fact that no chemicals will be used to grow the crops. The group is worried that the decision may give consumers the wrong impression about conventionally grown food.
“We live in a very different world than that of our grandparents. Americans are juggling jobs with the needs of children and aging parents,” the letter states. “The time needed to tend a garden is not there for the majority of our citizens, certainly not a garden of sufficient productivity to supply much of a family’s year-round food needs.”
Once victory gardens were a sign of patriotism. Now agribusiness wants you to think they're a sign of weakness. Really makes you wonder whose best interests they're looking out for.
1 comment:
This is excellent! I'm glad the Obama garden is organic. The only people that Agribusiness is managing to rally against organic farming are brainwashed docile consumers. A movement of scientists is now developing tools to make organic less labor-consuming, and it's egocentric of agribusiness to claim that their synthetic chemicals are the only path to progress. What of weeding robots? I hope the Obama garden crew gets to read about these scientific evidence that organic food is more nutritious, http://www.cabi.org/bk_BookDisplay.asp?SubjectArea=&Subject=&PID=2125
and about conferences gathering researchers in organic farming: http://www.qlif.org/
Post a Comment