So when he burst into the living room in anger after he overheard Mary Matalin on CNN, she must have said something pretty outrageous:
BLITZER: (reading Matalin quote) "I don't think he [Sen. John McCain] rests comfortably anywhere that conservatives would call home today. If it was true yesterday, it's not true for tomorrow's issues. The ones that he has chosen to take a lead on are the ones that conservatives either don't prioritize or flat-out loathe.""Unscientific hoax?!" my roommate shouted at the television. "Are you insane?!"
MATALIN: Like --
BLITZER: Like what?
MATALIN: -- some global warming issues. But he's going --
BLITZER: They loathe that?
MATALIN: Because it's a largely unscientific hoax. And it's a political concoction.
BLITZER: But he believes with [Sen.] Joe Lieberman [I-CT] -- he's co-sponsoring legislation on that.
MATALIN: He's going to have to put together an energy policy that has elements of conservation but productivity, and reduces our dependence on oil. He has said that. Some of the other issues, though --
BLITZER: But on global warming he's a true believer.
MATALIN: But he's not going to prioritize that, because that's not where the country is right now. And you haven't heard him prioritizing that.
As Media Matters details, it's not the first time a CNN analyst has asserted blatant falsehoods when it comes to global warming.
When it comes to the science of global warming, there is no debate about whether it's happening or whether our greenhouse gas emissions are to blame. There's debate about the degree to which we'll warm, how fast, and what we can do to cure the planet's fever.
There's confusion in the public's mind only because conservative pundits keep making stuff up about climate science and networks like CNN keep giving them free air time to do it. For the straight science, check out RealClimate.
As for whether McCain will "prioritize that," it's a bit of a puzzle. While he co-sponsored climate legislation with Sen. Joe Lieberman, he says he won't support the current version of the bill, the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, unless it includes more subsidies for nuclear power. If his ultimate goal is to cut carbon emissions, why is he prioritizing the nuclear industry over climate action? Odd.