
Darryl Fears has a good piece in today's Washington Post taking a closer look at
diversity in the environmental movement - or lack of it. Tough but fair. I work for an environmental organization and I agree green groups don't do nearly enough.
But what about polluters and their allies - how are
they doing on diversity?
- Exxon Mobil board of directors: 12 members, 2 women, 0 Hispanics, 2 African Americans
- Arch Coal board of directors: 11 members, 1 woman, 0 Hispanics, 0 African Americans
- Heritage Foundation board of trustees: 27 members, 8 women, 0 Hispanics, 1 African American
- Congressional Republican leadership (House & Senate): 10 members, 1 woman, 0 Hispanics, 0 African Americans
What about
workers in polluting industries? It's just as bad:
- Oil & gas extraction: 23% women, 9% Hispanic, 4% African American
- Coal mining: 6% women, 3% Hispanic, 1% African American
No one writes articles about polluting industries being almost entirely white men because
it's taken for granted that polluting industries are all run by rich old white guys. Even when they repeatedly get caught using stock photos to try to not look to the public like such rich old white guys - and
Republicans,
coal, and
chemical polluters all have - it isn't covered in the mainstream media because again, everyone is just supposed to already know that polluters are rich old white guys who buy pictures of non-rich old white guys to make themselves look like they care about non-rich old white guys.
Again, I think conservationists need to do more to reach out to Hispanics and African-Americans. Excluding them isn't just wrong, it's bad business -
polls show minorities are exceptionally strong supporters of climate action in particular and clean air & water in general.
But much like the media holds polluters and their allies
to a much lower standard ethically, they're held to
no standard on diversity.